OIP-1: OIP Purpose and Guidelines
Status
DRAFT
Type
Meta
Author(s)
OpenPond Core Team
Created
2024-01-05
Summary
OIP-1 describes the OIP process and explains what OIPs are. It also specifies the different OIP types and their respective requirements. This OIP is the reference for all other OIPs.
Motivation
The OpenPond Improvement Proposal (OIP) system provides a standardized process for proposing improvements to the OpenPond Protocol, documenting its design decisions, and ensuring community involvement in the protocol's evolution.
Specification
OIP Types
1. Standards Track OIP
Changes affecting OpenPond implementations or protocol interoperability. Must include:
- Design document
- Implementation
- Formal specification updates (if needed)
Categories:
Core
Core OIPs affect fundamental protocol operations:
- Identity and authentication
- Network topology and discovery
- Message formats and validation
- Security mechanisms
- Registry and permissions
- Economic and incentive mechanisms
Required sections for Core OIPs:
Protocol Changes
- Technical specification of changes
- Data structures and formats
- Backward compatibility
- Economic model changes (if applicable)
Security Considerations
- Security implications
- Threat analysis
- Mitigation strategies
- Economic security analysis (if applicable)
Implementation
- Reference implementation
- Test requirements
- Deployment plan
- Migration strategy
Networking
- P2P networking layer
- Agent discovery protocol
- Connection handling
- Peer discovery mechanisms
- Network message formats
Required sections:
- Protocol specification
- Network impact analysis
- Security considerations
- Reference implementation
ARC (Agent Request for Comments)
- Agent behavior standards
- Message format standards
- Capability declarations
- Interaction protocols
Required sections:
- Behavior specification
- Message formats
- Compatibility matrix
- Example scenarios
2. Meta OIP
Process-related proposals:
- Workflow changes
- Guidelines updates
- Decision-making processes
- Development tools/environment
Required sections:
- Process specification
- Rationale
- Implementation timeline
- Success metrics
3. Informational OIP
Design discussions and guidelines:
- Best practices
- Design patterns
- Implementation guidelines
- Architecture discussions
Required sections:
- Background
- Rationale
- References
- Additional resources
OIP Workflow
Ideation
- Discuss on forum
- Gather feedback
- Check for duplicates
Draft
- Use template
- Include all sections
- Technical review
Review
- Community feedback
- Technical assessment
- Security review
Last Call
- Final review period
- Address all concerns
- Update documentation
Final
- Merge implementation
- Update specification
- Archive discussions
OIP Format
OIPs should be written in Markdown format. Each OIP must begin with a header preamble:
# OIP-X: Title
## Status
[Draft|Review|Last Call|Final|Withdrawn]
## Type
[Standards Track (Core|Networking|Interface|ARC)|Meta|Informational]
## Author(s)
[Name <email>]
## Created
[YYYY-MM-DD]
Required Sections
- Summary - One paragraph explanation
- Motivation - Why this OIP is needed
- Specification - Technical details
- Rationale - Design decisions
- Backwards Compatibility (if applicable)
- Security Considerations (if applicable)
- Reference Implementation (if applicable)
- Copyright - License information
Rationale
This format is chosen to:
- Ensure comprehensive documentation
- Enable effective technical review
- Maintain historical record
- Support implementation efforts
- Facilitate community participation
Backwards Compatibility
This OIP is the foundation for the OIP process and does not affect existing protocol implementations.
Security Considerations
The OIP process includes security review requirements for changes that might affect protocol security.
Copyright
This OIP is licensed under the MIT License.