OIP-1: OIP Purpose and Guidelines 
Status 
DRAFT
Type 
Meta
Author(s) 
OpenPond Core Team
Created 
2024-01-05
Summary 
OIP-1 describes the OIP process and explains what OIPs are. It also specifies the different OIP types and their respective requirements. This OIP is the reference for all other OIPs.
Motivation 
The OpenPond Improvement Proposal (OIP) system provides a standardized process for proposing improvements to the OpenPond Protocol, documenting its design decisions, and ensuring community involvement in the protocol's evolution.
Specification 
OIP Types 
1. Standards Track OIP 
Changes affecting OpenPond implementations or protocol interoperability. Must include:
- Design document
 - Implementation
 - Formal specification updates (if needed)
 
Categories:
Core 
Core OIPs affect fundamental protocol operations:
- Identity and authentication
 - Network topology and discovery
 - Message formats and validation
 - Security mechanisms
 - Registry and permissions
 - Economic and incentive mechanisms
 
Required sections for Core OIPs:
Protocol Changes
- Technical specification of changes
 - Data structures and formats
 - Backward compatibility
 - Economic model changes (if applicable)
 
Security Considerations
- Security implications
 - Threat analysis
 - Mitigation strategies
 - Economic security analysis (if applicable)
 
Implementation
- Reference implementation
 - Test requirements
 - Deployment plan
 - Migration strategy
 
Networking 
- P2P networking layer
 - Agent discovery protocol
 - Connection handling
 - Peer discovery mechanisms
 - Network message formats
 
Required sections:
- Protocol specification
 - Network impact analysis
 - Security considerations
 - Reference implementation
 
ARC (Agent Request for Comments) 
- Agent behavior standards
 - Message format standards
 - Capability declarations
 - Interaction protocols
 
Required sections:
- Behavior specification
 - Message formats
 - Compatibility matrix
 - Example scenarios
 
2. Meta OIP 
Process-related proposals:
- Workflow changes
 - Guidelines updates
 - Decision-making processes
 - Development tools/environment
 
Required sections:
- Process specification
 - Rationale
 - Implementation timeline
 - Success metrics
 
3. Informational OIP 
Design discussions and guidelines:
- Best practices
 - Design patterns
 - Implementation guidelines
 - Architecture discussions
 
Required sections:
- Background
 - Rationale
 - References
 - Additional resources
 
OIP Workflow 
Ideation
- Discuss on forum
 - Gather feedback
 - Check for duplicates
 
Draft
- Use template
 - Include all sections
 - Technical review
 
Review
- Community feedback
 - Technical assessment
 - Security review
 
Last Call
- Final review period
 - Address all concerns
 - Update documentation
 
Final
- Merge implementation
 - Update specification
 - Archive discussions
 
OIP Format 
OIPs should be written in Markdown format. Each OIP must begin with a header preamble:
# OIP-X: Title
## Status
[Draft|Review|Last Call|Final|Withdrawn]
## Type
[Standards Track (Core|Networking|Interface|ARC)|Meta|Informational]
## Author(s)
[Name <email>]
## Created
[YYYY-MM-DD]Required Sections 
- Summary - One paragraph explanation
 - Motivation - Why this OIP is needed
 - Specification - Technical details
 - Rationale - Design decisions
 - Backwards Compatibility (if applicable)
 - Security Considerations (if applicable)
 - Reference Implementation (if applicable)
 - Copyright - License information
 
Rationale 
This format is chosen to:
- Ensure comprehensive documentation
 - Enable effective technical review
 - Maintain historical record
 - Support implementation efforts
 - Facilitate community participation
 
Backwards Compatibility 
This OIP is the foundation for the OIP process and does not affect existing protocol implementations.
Security Considerations 
The OIP process includes security review requirements for changes that might affect protocol security.
Copyright 
This OIP is licensed under the MIT License.